<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portland as a National Leader?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ppsequity.org/2008/03/12/portland-as-a-national-leader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ppsequity.org/2008/03/12/portland-as-a-national-leader/</link>
	<description>Covering the beat of Portland Public Schools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:00:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rawley</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2008/03/12/portland-as-a-national-leader/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/2008/03/12/portland-as-a-national-leader/#comment-455</guid>
		<description>There can be no doubt that all this testing causes anxiety. It also significantly reduces instruction time, and reduces the quality of the instruction time that remains.

I would love it if the PPS school board had the guts to take a stand like some of the other districts you cite.

I would also love it if the state or Oregon would fully invest in our schools, giving us some  leeway to thumb our noses at the feds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There can be no doubt that all this testing causes anxiety. It also significantly reduces instruction time, and reduces the quality of the instruction time that remains.</p>
<p>I would love it if the PPS school board had the guts to take a stand like some of the other districts you cite.</p>
<p>I would also love it if the state or Oregon would fully invest in our schools, giving us some  leeway to thumb our noses at the feds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Campbell</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2008/03/12/portland-as-a-national-leader/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/2008/03/12/portland-as-a-national-leader/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>I just read this piece from a Texas Superintendent:

TAKS BEAT DOWN EVERYONE&#039;S MORALE
Amarillo Globe News -- March 10, 2008
by Michael Stevens

Hereford, TX -- In conjunction with the TAKS testing, the State of Texas 
needs a morale-improvement program for its 4.3 million students and 
350,000 or so professional educators.

After due consideration and deliberation there can be only one title for 
the program -&quot;The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves.&quot;

I am exceptionally saddened and disappointed. Wednesday marked the 
beginning of &quot;TAKS Season.&quot;

I have observed visibly shaken children and adults enter into the annual 
testing season with what can only be described as raw fear. Eight- and 
10-year-old children are taking a test that will inexorably impact their 
future.

The testing started at 8:30 a.m. Some of the students finished at 6:30 
p.m. A child works as hard as possible to pass a test that truly 
measures nothing of consequence. Yet, if she or he fails, the test has 
to be taken again. If, after three attempts, a passing score has not 
been attained the child is supposed to repeat the grade. This is true 
even though we know that if a child is retained in a grade level there 
is little likelihood that she/he will complete high school. The child is 
labeled a &quot;failure,&quot; a label that will last a lifetime.

What do we know about children, schools and/or school districts that do 
not meet the testing and accountability standards established by the 
state and federal government? First, and foremost, we know that 
virtually every child that fails the test comes from families that are 
not blessed economically. Every child can learn well what is being 
taught - time is the variable.

As I approach the final few months of my career in public education I 
can only look back and ask the question: How did we get here? What 
started out in the 1980s as a tool to measure student progress has 
evolved into an incredible monster that is causing far more harm than 
good. Through some misguided notion that tests actually are indicators 
of quality we now use testing to measure the quality of a student and a 
school. It&#039;s insane!

Our public education system should be allowed to educate children, not 
merely test them. We spend about 50 to 60 school days each year either 
testing or preparing to test our children. Could we not reallocate the 
billions of dollars spent each year spent on testing and allow our 
wonderful educators to make learning fun, exciting and relevant. 
Children might actually learn!

Testing schools into quality, much the same as beating people until 
morale improves, hasn&#039;t worked. The time has come to change. To the 
policymakers in this state - I implore you to sit with an elementary 
principal when the scores are received as she has to tell a child that 
he failed.

You cannot possibly imagine the anguish!

Michael Stevens is superintendent of the Hereford Independent School 
District. Stevens recently announced his intentions to leave his office 
this summer.

http://www.amarillo.com/stories/031008/opi_9794293.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read this piece from a Texas Superintendent:</p>
<p>TAKS BEAT DOWN EVERYONE&#8217;S MORALE<br />
Amarillo Globe News &#8212; March 10, 2008<br />
by Michael Stevens</p>
<p>Hereford, TX &#8212; In conjunction with the TAKS testing, the State of Texas<br />
needs a morale-improvement program for its 4.3 million students and<br />
350,000 or so professional educators.</p>
<p>After due consideration and deliberation there can be only one title for<br />
the program -&#8221;The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am exceptionally saddened and disappointed. Wednesday marked the<br />
beginning of &#8220;TAKS Season.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have observed visibly shaken children and adults enter into the annual<br />
testing season with what can only be described as raw fear. Eight- and<br />
10-year-old children are taking a test that will inexorably impact their<br />
future.</p>
<p>The testing started at 8:30 a.m. Some of the students finished at 6:30<br />
p.m. A child works as hard as possible to pass a test that truly<br />
measures nothing of consequence. Yet, if she or he fails, the test has<br />
to be taken again. If, after three attempts, a passing score has not<br />
been attained the child is supposed to repeat the grade. This is true<br />
even though we know that if a child is retained in a grade level there<br />
is little likelihood that she/he will complete high school. The child is<br />
labeled a &#8220;failure,&#8221; a label that will last a lifetime.</p>
<p>What do we know about children, schools and/or school districts that do<br />
not meet the testing and accountability standards established by the<br />
state and federal government? First, and foremost, we know that<br />
virtually every child that fails the test comes from families that are<br />
not blessed economically. Every child can learn well what is being<br />
taught &#8211; time is the variable.</p>
<p>As I approach the final few months of my career in public education I<br />
can only look back and ask the question: How did we get here? What<br />
started out in the 1980s as a tool to measure student progress has<br />
evolved into an incredible monster that is causing far more harm than<br />
good. Through some misguided notion that tests actually are indicators<br />
of quality we now use testing to measure the quality of a student and a<br />
school. It&#8217;s insane!</p>
<p>Our public education system should be allowed to educate children, not<br />
merely test them. We spend about 50 to 60 school days each year either<br />
testing or preparing to test our children. Could we not reallocate the<br />
billions of dollars spent each year spent on testing and allow our<br />
wonderful educators to make learning fun, exciting and relevant.<br />
Children might actually learn!</p>
<p>Testing schools into quality, much the same as beating people until<br />
morale improves, hasn&#8217;t worked. The time has come to change. To the<br />
policymakers in this state &#8211; I implore you to sit with an elementary<br />
principal when the scores are received as she has to tell a child that<br />
he failed.</p>
<p>You cannot possibly imagine the anguish!</p>
<p>Michael Stevens is superintendent of the Hereford Independent School<br />
District. Stevens recently announced his intentions to leave his office<br />
this summer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amarillo.com/stories/031008/opi_9794293.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.amarillo.com/storie.....4293.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Olson</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2008/03/12/portland-as-a-national-leader/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/2008/03/12/portland-as-a-national-leader/#comment-423</guid>
		<description>I wholeheartedly agree, Peter, with ending the transfer policy, empowering teachers, and adopting a more developmentally appropriate curriculum.

But to &quot;expand&quot; all the so-called enrichment areas will require lots more money.  Since Measure 5, meager funding has decimated public school programs.  Federal and state accountability measures --mainly testing and school report cards-- and district school choice and transfer policies have only exacerbated the disastrous effects of underfunding the schools.  

I assume that what you mean by making all schools &quot;choice schools&quot;, you mean making sure that all have the same  attributes that make magnet or focus option schools attractive to so many upscale families.

I&#039;ve been arguing that for years.  There&#039;s no reason that neighborhood schools shouldn&#039;t be able to emphasize environmental education along with the arts and math and science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholeheartedly agree, Peter, with ending the transfer policy, empowering teachers, and adopting a more developmentally appropriate curriculum.</p>
<p>But to &#8220;expand&#8221; all the so-called enrichment areas will require lots more money.  Since Measure 5, meager funding has decimated public school programs.  Federal and state accountability measures &#8211;mainly testing and school report cards&#8211; and district school choice and transfer policies have only exacerbated the disastrous effects of underfunding the schools.  </p>
<p>I assume that what you mean by making all schools &#8220;choice schools&#8221;, you mean making sure that all have the same  attributes that make magnet or focus option schools attractive to so many upscale families.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been arguing that for years.  There&#8217;s no reason that neighborhood schools shouldn&#8217;t be able to emphasize environmental education along with the arts and math and science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
