<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Non-educators derail contract talks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/</link>
	<description>Covering the beat of Portland Public Schools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:00:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diane Dean</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-46503</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=1547#comment-46503</guid>
		<description>I am the bargaining rep at my school and will be attending a special meeting tomorrow afternoon. I will then find out about the details of the tentative agreement with the district. On Tuesday all PAT members will meet at their schools and the organizers will explain the contract and there will be a closed ballot taken at the end of the meeting. I think the school board wants us to think they are so giving and kind because they canceled our staff meeting this week and are allowing us to use that time for our meeting on Tuesday. More reason to support the notion that the school board is living in some alternative universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the bargaining rep at my school and will be attending a special meeting tomorrow afternoon. I will then find out about the details of the tentative agreement with the district. On Tuesday all PAT members will meet at their schools and the organizers will explain the contract and there will be a closed ballot taken at the end of the meeting. I think the school board wants us to think they are so giving and kind because they canceled our staff meeting this week and are allowing us to use that time for our meeting on Tuesday. More reason to support the notion that the school board is living in some alternative universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Adams</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-46123</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=1547#comment-46123</guid>
		<description>This is the entire content of the email from PPS:

&quot;FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: 
Rick Liebman,  Lead Negotiator for PPS, 503-276-2148

Portland Public Schools reaches tentative agreement with Portland Association of Teachers 


Portland, Ore., Feb. 13, 2010: Portland Public Schools and the Portland Association of Teachers have reached a tentative agreement on a new three-year contract, subject to ratification by the parties. Details of the tentative agreement will remain confidential until the terms are ratified by the parties.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the entire content of the email from PPS:</p>
<p>&#8220;FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT:<br />
Rick Liebman,  Lead Negotiator for PPS, 503-276-2148</p>
<p>Portland Public Schools reaches tentative agreement with Portland Association of Teachers </p>
<p>Portland, Ore., Feb. 13, 2010: Portland Public Schools and the Portland Association of Teachers have reached a tentative agreement on a new three-year contract, subject to ratification by the parties. Details of the tentative agreement will remain confidential until the terms are ratified by the parties.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Merry Sunshine</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-46122</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Merry Sunshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=1547#comment-46122</guid>
		<description>Tentative agreement, from pps email:

Portland Association of Teacher Members,
 
Portland Public Schools and the Portland Association of Teachers have reached a tentative agreement on a new three-year contract, subject to ratification by the parties. Details of the tentative agreement will remain confidential until the terms are ratified by the parties.
 
Your bargaining organizer at your site will have more information soon.
 
Thank you for all of your time and committment.
PAT President Rebecca Levison &amp; PAT Vice President Gwen Sullivan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tentative agreement, from pps email:</p>
<p>Portland Association of Teacher Members,</p>
<p>Portland Public Schools and the Portland Association of Teachers have reached a tentative agreement on a new three-year contract, subject to ratification by the parties. Details of the tentative agreement will remain confidential until the terms are ratified by the parties.</p>
<p>Your bargaining organizer at your site will have more information soon.</p>
<p>Thank you for all of your time and committment.<br />
PAT President Rebecca Levison &amp; PAT Vice President Gwen Sullivan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Merry Sunshine</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-46121</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Merry Sunshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=1547#comment-46121</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve looked everywhere online for something about the tentative agreement--please post as soon as you hear something!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve looked everywhere online for something about the tentative agreement&#8211;please post as soon as you hear something!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Adams</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-46119</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=1547#comment-46119</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been counting the days until my last child graduates from PPS.  Can anyone tell me with certainty what the impact of a teacher strike might be on seniors graduating this year?

Whoa.  That was timing.  I just received an email that PPS and PAT have reached a tentative agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been counting the days until my last child graduates from PPS.  Can anyone tell me with certainty what the impact of a teacher strike might be on seniors graduating this year?</p>
<p>Whoa.  That was timing.  I just received an email that PPS and PAT have reached a tentative agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-46098</link>
		<dc:creator>S.Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=1547#comment-46098</guid>
		<description>Read the column in today&#039;s O.  It talks about this issue (although from the perspective from the district).  Trudy Sargent spins it so the district is only asking for what is &quot;logical.&quot;  Too bad the paper didn&#039;t do the right thing, and get BOTH sides.  What a concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the column in today&#8217;s O.  It talks about this issue (although from the perspective from the district).  Trudy Sargent spins it so the district is only asking for what is &#8220;logical.&#8221;  Too bad the paper didn&#8217;t do the right thing, and get BOTH sides.  What a concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Buel</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-46063</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Buel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=1547#comment-46063</guid>
		<description>Bonnie, you are so right on! The reform crazy public and administration doesn&#039;t seem to understand that learning takes place in the classroom and teacher&#039;s time should be directed toward planning and improving their classroom. And in the end individulal teachers are the best judge of what this entails. The adminsitration&#039;s job should be to  support what the teacher is trying to do and make sure the building itself is working so as not to distract from learning. The stupid high stakes testing mixed in with the reform movement (basically cover my administrative ass programs)which has also been adopted by public officials to have them act like they know what is going on and are doing something
about poor kids education is so misdirected it is laughable. Though if you are doing all the crap and jumping through the hoops it ceases to be funny. 

Real PLC&#039;s are initiated from the workers (in this case teachers) and are controlled by them. What school districts have done is co-opt this from business and used it to advance the school reform agenda. Totally against what real PLC&#039;s are. Heck, who doesn&#039;t want to spend time chatting about their class with fellow teachers and, if the other teachers are good, planning some units together. But this is not the program. Too bad PPS&#039;s administration and school board don&#039;t get the destruction their reforms are causing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonnie, you are so right on! The reform crazy public and administration doesn&#8217;t seem to understand that learning takes place in the classroom and teacher&#8217;s time should be directed toward planning and improving their classroom. And in the end individulal teachers are the best judge of what this entails. The adminsitration&#8217;s job should be to  support what the teacher is trying to do and make sure the building itself is working so as not to distract from learning. The stupid high stakes testing mixed in with the reform movement (basically cover my administrative ass programs)which has also been adopted by public officials to have them act like they know what is going on and are doing something<br />
about poor kids education is so misdirected it is laughable. Though if you are doing all the crap and jumping through the hoops it ceases to be funny. </p>
<p>Real PLC&#8217;s are initiated from the workers (in this case teachers) and are controlled by them. What school districts have done is co-opt this from business and used it to advance the school reform agenda. Totally against what real PLC&#8217;s are. Heck, who doesn&#8217;t want to spend time chatting about their class with fellow teachers and, if the other teachers are good, planning some units together. But this is not the program. Too bad PPS&#8217;s administration and school board don&#8217;t get the destruction their reforms are causing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie Robb</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-46057</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=1547#comment-46057</guid>
		<description>Steve, those tests also reflect &quot;accountability&quot;.  Everyone has to &quot;prove&quot; that they are doing their job to the outside world.


This is why the contract stuff is frustrating to me.  Every year we are asked to do more with no more time.  Another workload issue came up because of Nike and other business leaders who think they know more about education than teachers.  

Until 3 or 4 years ago, k-5 teachers who were lucky enough to still have music, PE, or library for their students were able to use that time to make a copy, write a plan, call a parent, or just pee!

This WAS in addition to our pitiful 40 minute after school planning, which is never enough and why we all have to stay late.  But the time during music or PE certainly helped us get things done.

Then Carol Smith announced that the district was going to give kids in more schools &quot;enrichments&quot;, but not to worry, because the teacher would be given something to do when their classes were away.  (implying that we were NOT doing something during that time).
After that announcement, that time was given over to PLC&#039;s (professional learning communities) and &quot;Imbedded Professional Development&quot;, both of which amount to sitting around with grade level teams talking about student work and learning.
Sounds good in theory right?  Except, most of us don&#039;t have that much to talk about, are doing PD every week during &quot;staff meeting&quot;, and have more work than ever making every new district &quot;thing&quot; work.  
On a practical level, we lost almost 2 hours a week of planning, but now have more kids, more tests and more district initiatives we have to make work.
This is what the contract is about.  Giving us time to do the job you ask of us.  Teachers are tired.  We want to do our best by these wonderful students, but are not given the time or support to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, those tests also reflect &#8220;accountability&#8221;.  Everyone has to &#8220;prove&#8221; that they are doing their job to the outside world.</p>
<p>This is why the contract stuff is frustrating to me.  Every year we are asked to do more with no more time.  Another workload issue came up because of Nike and other business leaders who think they know more about education than teachers.  </p>
<p>Until 3 or 4 years ago, k-5 teachers who were lucky enough to still have music, PE, or library for their students were able to use that time to make a copy, write a plan, call a parent, or just pee!</p>
<p>This WAS in addition to our pitiful 40 minute after school planning, which is never enough and why we all have to stay late.  But the time during music or PE certainly helped us get things done.</p>
<p>Then Carol Smith announced that the district was going to give kids in more schools &#8220;enrichments&#8221;, but not to worry, because the teacher would be given something to do when their classes were away.  (implying that we were NOT doing something during that time).<br />
After that announcement, that time was given over to PLC&#8217;s (professional learning communities) and &#8220;Imbedded Professional Development&#8221;, both of which amount to sitting around with grade level teams talking about student work and learning.<br />
Sounds good in theory right?  Except, most of us don&#8217;t have that much to talk about, are doing PD every week during &#8220;staff meeting&#8221;, and have more work than ever making every new district &#8220;thing&#8221; work.<br />
On a practical level, we lost almost 2 hours a week of planning, but now have more kids, more tests and more district initiatives we have to make work.<br />
This is what the contract is about.  Giving us time to do the job you ask of us.  Teachers are tired.  We want to do our best by these wonderful students, but are not given the time or support to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Buel</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-46036</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Buel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=1547#comment-46036</guid>
		<description>These types of assessments are rediculous. Most teachers know darn well what each kid can do and should be left free to do assessements where they feel it is necessary. Testing EVERY kid in this manner is absurd. Another great example of the one-size fits all mentality of the school reform movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These types of assessments are rediculous. Most teachers know darn well what each kid can do and should be left free to do assessements where they feel it is necessary. Testing EVERY kid in this manner is absurd. Another great example of the one-size fits all mentality of the school reform movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Adams</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2010/02/08/non-educators-derail-contract-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-46035</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=1547#comment-46035</guid>
		<description>Bonnie, thanks for the information.  I know you work in a Title I school.  Did you know that Title I carried over almost $3 million from 08/09?  Schools didn&#039;t need it.

They probably won&#039;t need it this year either because the Title I budget grew significantly with the addition of the ARRA funds.  The pot is at $36 million now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonnie, thanks for the information.  I know you work in a Title I school.  Did you know that Title I carried over almost $3 million from 08/09?  Schools didn&#8217;t need it.</p>
<p>They probably won&#8217;t need it this year either because the Title I budget grew significantly with the addition of the ARRA funds.  The pot is at $36 million now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
