<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PPS Equity &#187; Nicole Leggett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ppsequity.org/author/nmleggett/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ppsequity.org</link>
	<description>Covering the beat of Portland Public Schools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>High schools: open letter to the Superintendent&#8217;s team</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2009/05/29/high-schools-open-letter-to-the-superintendents-team/</link>
		<comments>http://ppsequity.org/2009/05/29/high-schools-open-letter-to-the-superintendents-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Leggett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K-8 Transistion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Involvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A parent's letter to Carole Smith and her team regarding the high school redesign process.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Super Team,</p>
<p>I honestly feel that you missed some very clear issues that were expressed at the May 16th meeting.</p>
<p>You can not complete a diverse high school system redesign with out first addressing why it isn&#8217;t fair to begin with.  The lines that are drawn for our schools need to cross the River.  The wealth that lives in two schools should be spread around.  Not only so more school have access to more involved parents, but so the students on the West side have access to a diverse community to learn in.  Being able to relate to people of differing cultures is best taught young.  That is a privilege that is being denied to those children now.  In a 21st Century world we all need access to each other to grow to support our city, state, country, world.  </p>
<p>Along these lines, it is past time to give neighborhood schools their neighboring enrollment back.  It&#8217;s time to picture the school down the street as equivalent to the one across town.  All it needs is you to make it your neighborhood school.  What makes schools better is putting your children and your energy into it.  It was clear around the room that neighborhood-to-neighborhood elementary transfers must end.  But if honest concerns over quality of education aren&#8217;t addressed at the district level this can&#8217;t work.  We thought that was the job of the K-8 reconfiguration to resolve.  Where are the latest audit of K-8 course offerings for this year and next years planning?  </p>
<p>As you have said, quality of high school course offerings has to be universal.  But as the students explained, the specific educational offerings must to vary to offer specialized learning to motivated youth.  So perhaps the idea is to have elementary education equalized and neighborhood focused.  But to compliment this idea have an open specialty transfer process at the high school level.  Where your neighborhood high school offerings are the same and if you aren&#8217;t interested in a magnet program you attend your neighborhood high school.  But with the aid of publicly provided transportation, students would be free and able to choose a specialized course offering housed in another school.  This would end the Kindergarten scuffle of worried parents that don&#8217;t feel comfortable with the feeder pastern of their neighborhood school.  </p>
<p>More than anything it was expressed that the highest level of quality education should be offered to all children in all zip codes.  Thank you for all of your efforts.  Please continue to involve and inform the community at large as we proceed together towards a better tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ppsequity.org/2009/05/29/high-schools-open-letter-to-the-superintendents-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transfer Inequity</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2008/05/19/transfer-inequity/</link>
		<comments>http://ppsequity.org/2008/05/19/transfer-inequity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Leggett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been some time since a deep audit of the School Choice and Transfer Policy revealed glaring inequity and segregation. Yet nothing has been spoken of, as to how to start repairing this system. I like to think that the district has some long term idea to deal with this. But perhaps we could come [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been some time since a deep audit of the School Choice and Transfer Policy revealed glaring inequity and segregation. Yet nothing has been spoken of, as to how to start repairing this system. I like to think that the district has some long term idea to deal with this. But perhaps we could come up with some low cost/no cost mends today.</p>
<p>My initial idea would help parents not chosen by the transfer lottery still have some <em>choice</em>. The School board should recommend that after the lottery is awarded, up till the First week of School, transfers will be available, on a first come first served basis, to any schools that have room for more enrollment. Not only would this add choice it would help the schools transfered to increase enrollment before Add Back FTE time.</p>
<p>Anyone else have ideas that can be submitted to the School Board as short term free fixes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ppsequity.org/2008/05/19/transfer-inequity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remarks to the School Board re. curriculum adoption</title>
		<link>http://ppsequity.org/2008/05/14/remarks-to-the-school-board/</link>
		<comments>http://ppsequity.org/2008/05/14/remarks-to-the-school-board/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 05:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Leggett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curriculum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppsequity.org/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are the remarks delivered by Peninsula parent Nicole Leggett to the PPS Board of Education Monday, May 14, 2008. &#8211;ed.
Good Evening, School Board,
I&#8217;m Nicole Leggett of Peninsula School. It has come to my attention that schools across the district have need of access to books. But not through another multi-million dollar curriculum adoption. What [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>These are the remarks delivered by Peninsula parent Nicole Leggett to the PPS Board of Education Monday, May 14, 2008. &#8211;ed.</em></p>
<p>Good Evening, School Board,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m Nicole Leggett of Peninsula School. It has come to my attention that schools across the district have need of access to books. But not through another multi-million dollar curriculum adoption. What we need for are <em>librarians</em> to input, shelve, and then be there to check out the vast collections of books, we have already spent valuable resources on. Really we need to put what we have to good use, before you adopt a Social Studies curriculum that lacks sufficient buy-in to prove it&#8217;s urgently needed.</p>
<p>In a District with 43% drop out rate, we need to think about proven strategies that work across the varied demographics we have. Access to a library and the additional attention found there works every time. As the Mound of Information submitted to you from the United Librarians supports. 43% drop out rate screams crisis to us parents. Slow this curriculum adoptions process. Or dig into the reserve or levy. Our children deserve to read that book, in the back room, that can&#8217;t be checked out or shelved though the new system by Willing Volunteers. Give us librarians to do their job. We can&#8217;t fix this gross waste of resource, but you can. Put the Social Studies adoption off for a year. Till you can show it is as supported by staff, parents, and students as the PE adoption seems to be.</p>
<p>The Local Option Levy was passed by the public for many reasons. Not just the new Text Books the District has focused these funds on. Diversify the public&#8217;s interest. Go with something we know works. Access to books! I urge you to postpone this adoption. To instead implement an Open Library Policy.</p>
<p>Also, Please explain what K-8 families can expect from Archon, Inc. for the $100,000 that is proposed tonight?</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ppsequity.org/2008/05/14/remarks-to-the-school-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
